Do Dogs Have an Edge Over Humans When it Comes To Intelligence
I would have to say yes – dogs have an intelligence that exceeds and defies many modern day humans…and within this concept resides the real key to understanding and training your dog...
Your inherited traits determine your pre-disposition to be:
- An introvert or an extrovert
- Left Brain, or Right Brain.
- Left Brain Hemisphere;
- If you fall into this category you may have a pre-disposition to be:
- Naturally confident...
- Calm,
- Dominant;
- Tolerant.
- Right Brain Hemisphere
- If you fall into this category you may have a pre-disposition to be:
- Naturally insecure...
- Lacking in confidence;
- Nervous;
- Anxious;
- Fearful.
- When humans get together to form a crowd, which then due to various triggers results in a heightened degree of reactivity.
- One or more people in the crowd instantaneously react, and;
- Other individuals in the crowd respond;
- Either matching the state of the first people to react, or;
- Reacting in a polar opposite manner but with the same intensity;
- Within a matter of seconds (depending on the situation):
- Fear and panic spread, or;
- Violence, and/or;
- Avarice and greed may result in looting, theft, etc.
- This is commonly known as:
- Crowd Behaviour/Mentality or;
- Mob Behaviour/Mentality;
- In the extended animal kingdom (beings other than ‘mankind’) this same type of behaviour is referred to as Pack Mentality'
I always find it interesting but profoundly sad and indicative of our true intelligence that humans must have one term for human behaviour and another for non-human behaviour – though the ‘behaviour’ exhibited may be the same regardless of the type of animal (human or non-human).
- Me first;
- Solely for my good – not for the greater good;
- It must be noted that the first type of intelligence
- This is not leadership it is instead reflective of the widely misunderstood term ‘Alpha’
- While all of the above may promote short term survival, it does not promote long-term survival of an individual, a species or a planet.
- Also interesting to note...
- What is it that humans like so much about dogs?...
- A dog's selflessness;
- And what is it that many human beings have a very difficult time being?
- Selfless.
- Limits the individual human's perspective;
- Which in-turn reduces that individual's potential for broader intelligence;
- Which leaves the door-open for that individual's intelligence to become narrowly focused to the point of obsession or extremism;
- Which when shared and adopted by other human beings, limits collective human intelligence;
- Which leaves the door-open for crowd mentality - the collective intelligence of the group of people may become narrowly focused to the point of obsession or extremism;
- BSL/DDA is not based on actual fact, but instead on a narrow, uninformed perspective;
- Human hurbris which then creates genocide...mass murder carried out by man'kind' whether done to humans or dogs it is genocide
- Intuition;
- Common sense;
- Combined with;
- Logic;
- Self-awareness;
- Self restraint;
- Empathy;
- Consideration;
- Patience;
- Humility.
- Understand and look at something from multiple perspectives (as opposed to a linear and/or judgmental perspective);
- Filtered through commonsense and self-discipline;
- The human is deploying mature, considered intelligence;
- Rather than allowing ire, raw unconsidered emotion and greed to take over.
- By observing and assessing what truly presents to their senses;
- Rather than what they assume – based on preconceived notions.
- A perfect example of this is the typical notion that a dog is just a dog and cannot possibly be smiling.
- A conceit which is factually incorrect.
- Despite the fact that mankind has lived with dogs for 30 thousand years;
- The mass of humanity via our assumption that our (humankind’s) abilities outstrip that of other animals - has for most people, blinded them to the fact that dogs do smile.
- You dog, me human and for that reason alone dog, you shall do as I say;
- Your intelligence (dog) is such that I must either use:
- Treats, and/or;
- Silly tactics (i.e. dropping chain bags, marching you in different directions while on a lead, spraying you in the face, putting a pheromone collar on you, placing little piles of food on the floor so you understand that it is me the human feeding you, etc.), and/or;
- Force-dominance ‘training’.
The Ability To Communicate Effectively
If you are not perceptive and are not a particularly good communicator your ability to understand others can be seriously and adversely effected.
- Do you know if you are a well-rounded perceptive and effective communicator?
- Does your ability to communicate match your dog's ability to perceive and communicate?
- Sight i.e...
- Observation of Body Language i.e...
- Facial expressions (dog and human faces);
- Micro body language - i.e. tension in the way you hold your hand;
- Macro body language - i.e. how you stand and occupy space;
- How you move - i.e. quickly in agitation or frustration, forcefully in anger, grounded, solid and calm, etc.
- Sound i.e...
- Pitch/timber of voice;
- Emotion behind voice;
- Scent i.e.
- If a human is nervous your scent can be slightly different than when you are calm - a dog's sense of smell is so acute slight changes in scent are perceptible;
- Breathing i.e.
- Short, deep, regular, withheld, etc.
- Extra Sensory Perception, and;
- Touch;
- Touch is a natural way to communicate; however how you touch and the state of mind you are in when you touch are of the most profound importance;
- Well adjusted dogs do not resort to harsh physical contact, they will always use the most minimal of interventions required by the situation at hand;
- Touch is a very important tool to communicate, but touch most be used properly, with respect;
- Touch can also be very important to assist a nervous, anxious dog;
- There are many respectful ways to use to touch to communicate to a dog.
And Then There is Heightened Sensitivity, Another Layer of Intelligence...
People (highly sensitive people - HSP)
Dogs (highly sensitive dogs - HSD)
It is my very firm belief - proven by the work that I do with such dogs - that dogs that are being diagnosed as ADHD are in fact not ADHD - they are instead HSDs.
- Is not a disorder;
- Is not a disadvantage when recognized, and;
- In fact it can be a valuable gift and advantage - which simply presents another layer of intelligence...for example:
- An HSP or HSD can quickly read the mood of another person (human/canine); can pick up the scent of illness, sense the onset of a seizure before it occurs, be extra attentive, etc.
If he/she is, heightened sensitivity is often a sign of great intelligence and can be a real asset - when understood and leveraged the right way - read all about HSDs here.
Can lack of consideration in taking into account social and cultural norms affect your intelligence? Yes, because it can effect your judgement, your approach and your understanding of a situation.
Here is an example:
- White Anglo-Saxons males greet each other by shaking hands;
- French Quebecois may choose to greet each other with a light kiss on either side of the face;
- A white Anglo-Saxon - who has never seen the typical French Quebecois greeting; might react with great offense at having their personal space invaded to the point of being kissed on either cheek.
- Hand-shaking and/or kissing in greeting was not a traditional means of greeting for the indigenous peoples of Northern Canada.
- Why? Well for very practical reasons. In deep-cold temperatures hands can freeze if exposed to the cold, as well shaking someone's hands when your hands are encumbered by bulky gloves is not practical;
- Kissing is not practical when exposed to deep cold as lips can freeze;
- If instead the means of greeting was to rub noses, hands would remain warm and lips would remain safe from freezing. So rubbing noses to greet made greet sense for those living in the extremely cold climate of the north.
- If you do not have an awareness of how a culture, different from the one you grew up in functions you can make make social blunders which may be inconvenient at best and physically or psychologically damaging at worst.
A dog's natural method of greeting starts with the nose and not (as many humans insist on doing) invading immediate personal space with frenzied pats and high pitched voices. Invasion of personal space and lack of consideration in when and how we touch another being (human or canine)shows little attention to forethought, respect and for that matter intelligence.
Humans set their children up from a very young age to have limited intelligence when it comes to respecting and understanding a dog. Take a look at this and see if any of this sounds familiar to you.
The question I would pose to you is how does a human reflect a high level of intelligence when that human adamantly insists on greeting a dog in a manner that is disrespectful to a dog?
Would you go up to someone from another culture and greet them in a manner that was destabilizing or threatening to them? No, not if you were employing your intelligence.
Is it a reflection of ignorance, entitlement and lack of common sense? It seems to me that that mankind has a long standing notion that all other species on this earth are:
- Less intelligent than a human, and;
- Are due less respect than a human.
Dogs Have Many Similarities to Humans?
What happens if every time a child does something that is normal, polite, respectful - you give that child a treat? That child learns an altered state of normal...'for every normal thing I do in life I must be rewarded with a material thing (food, toy, etc.)'. Should the parent put this type of reward-based system in place, that child will become a mal-adjusted human being, who will likely also be overweight and have bad teeth. And what do you do if you are out with the child and forget to bring treats, you are not near s store , yet you need the child to 'behave themselves'. You will have a non-complaint, un-coperative little person on your hands.
And what happens when that person enters school and later then workforce - it will be difficult for that person to cope with real normal.
It is the same for a dog. A dog does not require treats as an incentive to perform a normal, social skill - adult dogs do not give puppy's treats..the adult dog simply provides the puppy with clear, respectful direction. The puppy complies. It is only when the human is an uninformed communicator that treats are required to get a puppy to comply to normal behaviour.
So, who has greater intelligence:
- The mother dog who teaches her puppies social skills by using clear communication, or;
- The human who does not grasp how to communicate effectively and therefore must entice a puppy with treats?
- First correct the human's behaviour, and at the same time;
- Communicate effectively with the dog;
- Ensure that there is proper structure in the dog's daily life:
- Which includes closing the gaps in all of 'little behaviours' (that occur in the span of a typical day) which feed the larger 'unwanted behaviours' (what most people see as the' dog's issue').
Take a quick read here and you will find an example of the great intelligence of dogs - sure to make you smile.
And with that I leave you to ponder the true intelligence of man v.s. dog.
Excellent article, plenty of research and valuable information.
ReplyDeleteI loved this article, it was very instructive.
ReplyDeleteThank you Annelise :>)
Delete